Introduction
Force majeure clauses have evolved from boilerplate provisions into strategic tools for UAE traders navigating supply chain shocks, regulatory changes, and global disruptions.
Under the Civil Transactions Law (Federal Law No. 5 of 1985, as amended) and the Commercial Transactions Law (Federal Decree-Law No. 50 of 2022), parties benefit from strong legal protections—ranging from automatic termination to judicial relief—provided these rights are supported by precise drafting, robust documentation, and proactive mitigation.
This article examines how traders can secure these rights and manage risk effectively in times of disruption.
Termination for Impossibility
Article 273 of the Civil Transactions Law establishes the key principle:
Where force majeure renders performance objectively impossible, reciprocal obligations are extinguished by operation of law (ipso facto).
In practice, judicial confirmation may be required where disputes arise.
Key Considerations
- Parties must restore any benefits received
- No further liability arises once obligations are extinguished
Partial or Temporary Impossibility
- Article 273(2): Allows termination of affected obligations or rescission of the entire contract
- Temporary disruptions may justify suspension or adjustment rather than termination
Sector-Specific Applications
- Article 306 (Commercial Transactions Law): Carriers may avoid liability for transport loss due to force majeure
- Article 179(2): Warehouse keepers may resist claims where loss arises from uncontrollable events
Legal Threshold
Courts require the event to be:
- Unforeseeable
- Beyond the party’s control
- Truly impossible to overcome
Commercial inconvenience or increased cost alone is insufficient.
Judicial Relief and Liability Protection
Article 287 – External Cause
Provides relief where non-performance results from factors beyond a party’s control, including force majeure or third-party actions.
Distinction Between Impossibility and Hardship
- Article 273 (Impossibility): Contract obligations are extinguished
- Article 249 (Hardship): Courts may reduce obligations where performance becomes excessively burdensome
Good Faith Obligation (Article 246)
Parties must:
- Act transparently and honestly
- Notify counterparties promptly
- Take reasonable steps to mitigate losses
Required Evidence
- Nature of the event
- Impact on performance
- Mitigation efforts
- Good faith actions
Limitation Periods
- Article 319 (Commercial Transactions Law): Six-month limitation for certain transport claims
Delays in asserting rights may weaken legal standing.
Strategic Contract Drafting
While statutory provisions provide a framework, carefully drafted clauses are essential.
A strong force majeure clause should:
- Clearly define covered events
- Specify notice requirements
- Outline consequences (suspension vs termination)
- Address prolonged disruption scenarios
Well-drafted clauses reduce ambiguity and strengthen enforceability.
Documentation and Evidence
Documentation is critical in any force majeure claim.
Parties should maintain:
- Contractual notices and correspondence
- Supplier and logistics communications
- Shipping and customs records
- Internal operational records
- Evidence of mitigation efforts (rerouting, alternative sourcing)
Properly maintained commercial records may also carry evidentiary weight under Article 35 of the Commercial Transactions Law.
Practical Insight from Recent Case Law
Recent Dubai Court of Cassation rulings highlight the importance of evidence and causation.
DCC 505/2025
- Force majeure claim rejected
- Lack of certified documentation (e.g., maritime protest)
- Damage attributed to failure to meet professional standards
DCC 1586/2025
- Force majeure accepted (April 2024 Dubai floods)
- Event deemed exceptional and unforeseeable
- No fault attributed to the defendant
- Causation between event and damage established
Key Judicial Principles
- Force majeure must be proven with credible evidence
- Causation must be clearly established
- Absence of fault is essential
- Negligence defeats the defence
Conclusion
Force majeure remains a powerful legal protection under UAE law, but its effectiveness depends on:
- Careful contractual drafting
- Timely and proper notice
- Comprehensive documentation
Where performance is impossible, obligations may be extinguished. Where hardship exists, courts may adjust obligations instead.
For UAE businesses, the key lies in anticipating disruption, maintaining records, and responding in a legally and commercially sound manner.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
1. What is the difference between impossibility and hardship under UAE law?
Impossibility (Article 273) arises when performance becomes objectively impossible, leading to termination of obligations. Hardship (Article 249) applies when performance becomes excessively burdensome, allowing courts to adjust obligations rather than terminate the contract.
2. Can a contract be automatically terminated due to force majeure?
While Article 273 provides for automatic extinguishment of obligations, judicial confirmation is often required in practice if the matter is disputed.
3. What evidence is required to support a force majeure claim?
Evidence may include certified documents such as maritime reports, commercial records, formal notices to counterparties, and proof of mitigation efforts.
4. Were the Dubai 2024 floods considered force majeure?
Yes. In DCC 1586/2025, the Court recognized the floods as an exceptional and unforeseeable event that directly caused damage without fault.
5. Is there a time limit for filing force majeure-related claims?
Yes. For example, Article 319 of the Commercial Transactions Law imposes a six-month limitation period for certain transport-related claims.
If you require further clarification or legal assistance concerning the matters discussed in this article, please do not hesitate to contact Kh legal Advocates & Legal Consultants LLC. Our lawyers would be happy to assist you.
Authors:
